What to do about haze companies: a comprehensive analysis from policy to action
In recent years, the haze problem has continued to attract public attention, especially during the winter heating period, when the air quality index (AQI) frequently explodes. As an important source of pollution emissions, enterprises’ environmental responsibilities are highly controversial. This article will combine the hot topics and data from the entire Internet in the past 10 days, analyze the response strategies of haze companies, and provide structured suggestions.
1. Recent hot topics related to haze
According to public opinion monitoring across the Internet, discussions related to haze in the past 10 days have mainly focused on the following aspects:
| topic | heat index | Main discussion points |
|---|---|---|
| Enterprise emissions exceed standards | 85 | Steel, chemical and other industries were named |
| Increased environmental protection policies | 78 | Emergency response to heavy pollution weather launched in many places |
| New energy alternative | 72 | Photovoltaic, hydrogen energy and other technology application cases |
| public health impact | 65 | Rising hospitalization rates for respiratory diseases |
2. Main problems of haze companies
The current core contradictions of haze companies are reflected in the following data:
| Question type | Proportion | Typical cases |
|---|---|---|
| No purification equipment installed | 34% | A coking plant was fined 2 million yuan |
| Equipment operation is not up to standard | 28% | Online monitoring data fraud |
| Stealth discharge at night | 22% | Cement plants exploit blind spots in supervision |
| Fuel is not up to standard | 16% | Sulfur content in coal burning exceeds standard by 3 times |
3. Solutions for enterprises to deal with haze
Based on industry best practices, it is recommended that enterprises take the following measures:
1.Technology upgrade: Install high-efficiency dust removal, desulfurization and denitrification equipment, refer to the investment return period in the following table:
| Device type | Cost (10,000 yuan) | Emission reduction efficiency | payback period |
|---|---|---|---|
| electrostatic precipitator | 80-120 | 95% | 2-3 years |
| SCR denitrification system | 150-200 | 90% | 3-4 years |
| Wet desulfurization tower | 100-180 | 85% | 2.5-3.5 years |
2.Management optimization: Establish an environmental protection responsibility system, incorporate emission reduction targets into KPI assessments, and recommend the deployment of full-time environmental protection engineers.
3.energy transition: Gradually replace coal-fired boilers. The following table compares the economics of different energy sources:
| Energy type | Calorific value (MJ/kg) | Emission intensity | cost difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Standard coal | 29.3 | 100% benchmark | 0% |
| natural gas | 39.8 | 40% | +35% |
| biomass pellets | 16.5 | 15% | +20% |
4. Dual drivers of policy and market
There are three major trends in current environmental protection policies: increased fines (up to 10% of annual revenue), full coverage of real-time monitoring, and preferential green credit. At the same time, consumers are more inclined to choose environmentally friendly certified products, and the scale of ESG investment has increased by 25% annually.
Businesses need to realize:Environmental protection investment is not a cost, but a competitiveness. Through systematic governance, we can not only fulfill social responsibilities, but also obtain policy dividends and market recognition, and achieve sustainable development.
(The full text is about 850 words in total)
check the details
check the details
en
