What kind of remote control is used for F4 flight control?
In the fields of drones and model aircraft, F4 flight control is favored by players for its high performance and stability. Choosing the right remote control is key to ensuring a good flying experience. This article will combine the hot topics and hot content on the Internet in the past 10 days to provide you with a detailed analysis of the remote control selection for F4 flight control and provide structured data for reference.
1. Introduction to F4 flight control
F4 flight controller is a flight controller developed based on the STM32F4 series chip. It supports a variety of firmware (such as Betaflight, INAV, etc.) and is widely used in traversing aircraft, fixed-wing and multi-rotor drones. Its powerful processing power and rich interfaces make it the first choice for mid-to-high-end players.
2. Remote control types compatible with F4 flight control
F4 flight control usually communicates with the remote controller through the receiver and supports multiple protocols. The following are common remote control types and their characteristics:
| Remote control type | Agreement | Features | Recommended models |
|---|---|---|---|
| FrSky | ACCST,ACCESS | High cost performance, widely compatible | Taranis X9D, X-Lite |
| FlySky | AFHDS, AFHDS 2A | Entry level, affordable price | FS-i6, FS-i6X |
| Spektrum | DSM2,DSMX | Stable, suitable for fixed wings | DX6, DX8 |
| Jumper | Multi-protocol | Multi-protocol support, strong flexibility | T-Lite, T16 |
| RadioMaster | Multi-protocol | High cost performance and rich functions | TX12, TX16S |
3. How to choose a remote control suitable for F4 flight control
Consider the following factors when choosing a remote control:
1.budget: Beginner players can choose the entry-level models of FlySky or FrSky, and high-end players can consider the multi-protocol remote controls of Jumper or RadioMaster.
2.Protocol compatibility: Make sure the protocol supported by the remote control matches the F4 flight control receiver.
3.Functional requirements: If you need advanced functions (such as Lua scripts, tuner modules), it is recommended to choose RadioMaster TX16S or Jumper T16.
4.Feel and portability: Small remote controls (such as Jumper T-Lite) are suitable for portability, and full-size remote controls (such as FrSky X9D) are more suitable for long-term operation.
4. Performance comparison of popular remote controls
The following are recent popular remote control models and their performance comparisons:
| Model | price range | Protocol support | Number of channels | screen |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FrSky Taranis X9D | 800-1200 yuan | ACCST,ACCESS | 16 | color |
| RadioMaster TX16S | 1000-1500 yuan | Multi-protocol | 16 | touch screen |
| Jumper T-Lite | 400-600 yuan | Multi-protocol | 12 | monochrome |
| FlySky FS-i6X | 300-500 yuan | AFHDS 2A | 10 | monochrome |
5. User feedback and hot topics
Based on the hot topics of discussion in the past 10 days, the following are common comments from players on the F4 flight control remote control:
1.RadioMaster TX16S: It has become popular recently due to its touch screen and multi-protocol support, but some users have reported short battery life.
2.Jumper T-Lite: Compact and portable, suitable for time travel players, but has fewer channels.
3.FrSky X9D: Old model with high stability, but relatively high price.
4.FlySky FS-i6X: Cost-effective and suitable for novices, but the protocol compatibility is limited.
6. Summary
The selection of remote controller for F4 flight control needs to be comprehensively considered based on budget, protocol compatibility and functional requirements. For most players,RadioMaster TX16SandJumper T-LiteIt is a cost-effective choice, and high-end players can consider the flagship models of FrSky or Spektrum. I hope the structured data in this article can help you find the right remote control quickly!
check the details
check the details
en
